Legal Opinion
Price v. Himeji, LLC
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided June 25, 2013PublishedCited by 84 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hoens
This appeal requires the Court to consider two issues relating to applications for zoning variances pursuant to the Municipal Land Use Law (MLUL), N.J.S.A. 40:55D-1 to -163.
*269The principal question raised in this appeal is whether an application for a use variance, see N.J.S.A 40:55D-70(d)(1), based on the assertion that the site is “particularly suitable for the proposed use,” see Medici v. BPR Co., 107 N.J. 1, 4, 526 A.2d 109 (1987), requires proof that the project must be built on that site because it is the only one available. This issue arises because the Law Division interpreted the…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Kramer v. BD. OF ADJUST., SEA GIRT.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
- Southern Burlington County N.A.A.C.P. v. Township of Mount LaurelSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
- Medici v. BPR Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
- Riggs v. Township of Long BeachSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
- Smart SMR of New York, Inc. v. Borough of Fair Lawn Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by84 opinions
- Richard Grabowsky v. Twp. of Montclair (073142)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2015
- Dunbar Homes, Inc. v. Zoning Bd. of Adjustment of the Twp. of FranklinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2018
- In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of D.Y. Svp 491-08Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2014
- State v. Nathan Shaw State v. Keon L. Bolden (078247) (Monmouth County and Statewide)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2019
- Brunswick Bank & Trust v. Heln Mgmt. LLCNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2018
79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.