Legal Opinion

Smart SMR of New York, Inc. v. Borough of Fair Lawn Board of Adjustment

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided January 26, 1998PublishedCited by 98 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

POLLOCK, J.

At issue is whether respondent, Smart SMR of New York, Inc., d/b/a Nextel Communications (Smart), is entitled to a use variance under N.J.S.A. 40:55D-70(d) (“subsection d” or “use variance”) to erect a 140-foot telecommunications “monopole” in an industrial zone in the Borough of Fair Lawn. The Fair Lawn Board of Adjustment (the Board) denied Smart’s application for a use variance, and the Law Division affirmed. In an unreported opinion, the Appellate Division reversed. We granted the Board’s petition for certification, 148 N.J. 460, 690…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Medici v. BPR Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
  2. Burbridge v. Governing BodySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
  3. Kohl v. Mayor and Council of Borough of Fair LawnSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1967
  4. Sica v. Board of Adjustment of Tp. of WallSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
  5. BellSouth Mobility Inc. v. Gwinnett County, GADistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1996

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by98 opinions

  1. Lapid-Laurel, L.L.C. v. Zoning Board Of Adjustment Of The Township Of Scotch PlainsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
  2. Price v. Himeji, LLCSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2013
  3. Cell South of NJ, Inc. v. ZONING BD. OF ADJUSTMENT OF WEST WINDSOR TWP.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2002
  4. New Brunswick Cellular Telephone Co. v. Borough of South Plainfield Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
  5. Cellco Partnership v. Town Plan & Zoning Commission of FarmingtonDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1998

93 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API