Legal Opinion

People v. Behee

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 19, 1892PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Exceptions before judgment from the recorder’s court of Detroit. (Chambers, J.) Respondent was convicted of obtainihg property by false pretenses. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

The respondent was convicted in the recorder’s -court of the city of Detroit, September 8, 1891, of the offense of obtaining property by false pretenses.

*358After the jury had been impaneled, and a witness sworn for the people, respondent's counsel objected to any testimony being given, because there was no offense charged in the information. The information charges—

“That Charles Behee, late of said city of Detroit, heretofore, to wit, on the 9th day of July, A. D. 1891, at the said city of Detroit, in the county aforesaid, with intent to cheat and defraud Edwin S. Barbour, and fraudulently to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. OlmsteadMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
  2. People v. WakelyMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Jacobs v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1890
  4. People v. ReynoldsMichigan Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. People v. RiceMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Owens v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Bazzell v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1919
  4. People v. FitzgeraldMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  5. People v. LennoxMichigan Supreme Court · 1895

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API