Legal Opinion

Metropolitan Homes, Inc. v. Town Plan & Zoning Commission

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided June 30, 1964PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShea, J.

The defendant has appealed from a judgment of the Court of Common Pleas sustaining the plaintiff’s appeal from the action of the defendant in changing the zone of certain property from E 20 to E 30.

The planning and zoning regulations of Farming-ton contain the following requirements: In an E 20 zone, lots must have a minimum frontage of 100 feet, 20,000 square feet of area and, where dwellings are erected, a minimum of 1000 square feet of floor area; in an E 30 zone, lots must have a minimum frontage of 125 feet, 30,000 square feet of area and, where dwellings are erected, a minimum of 1200…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Winslow v. Zoning BoardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
  2. Kutcher v. Town Planning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
  3. Guerriero v. GalassoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1957
  4. Kuehne v. Town CouncilSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1950
  5. Mallory v. Town of West HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Carpenter v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
  2. Sheridan v. Planning BoardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
  3. Forest Construction Co. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
  4. Stiles v. Town CouncilSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1970
  5. Morningside Assn. v. Planning & Zoning BoardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API