Legal Opinion
Consolidated Rubber Tire Co. v. B. F. Goodrich Co.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided April 11, 1912No. 29,176PublishedCited by 1 opinion
In Equity. Suit by the Consolidated Rubber Tire Company and the Rubber Tire Wheel Company against the B'. F. Goodrich Company. On final hearing.
1Opinion of the Court
KOHLSAAT, Circuit Judge.
This bill was filed to enjoin infringement of the two claims of patent No. 554,675, granted to A. W. Grant, February 18, 1896, for a rubber tired wheel. The claims read as follows, viz.:
“1. A vehicle-wheel having a metallic rim with angularly-projecting flanges to form a channel or groove with tapered or inclined sides, a rubber tire, the inner portion of which is adapted to fit in said groove or channel and the outer portion having sides at an angle to the inner portion, the angle or corner between the outer and inner portions being located within the outer *765periphery…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Diamond Rubber Co. of New York v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Gayler v. WilderSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
- De La Vergne Refrigerating MacHine Co. v. FeatherstoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Bullock Electric & Mfg. Co. v. Westinghouse Electric & Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1904
- Minor v. TillotsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1833
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Consolidated Rubber Tire Co. v. Republic Rubber Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1912