Legal Opinion
HARTSON PARTNERSHIP v. Martinez
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided August 23, 2004No. 51493-8-IPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
96 P.3d 449 (2004)
HARTSON PARTNERSHIP dba Town and Country Villa MHP, Respondent,
v.
Jorge and Rosina MARTINEZ, husband and wife, and the marital community, Appellants.
No. 51493-8-I.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.
August 23, 2004.
Reconsideration Denied October 6, 2004.
David J. James, AvantLaw PLLC, Seattle, WA, for Respondent.
Dan Robert Young, Attorney at Law, Seattle, WA, for Appellant.
AGID, J.
Jorge and Rosina Martinez were evicted from a mobile home park. They appeal, arguing that the park management failed to mediate the dispute as required by Washington's Mobile Home…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Franklin County Sheriff's Office v. SellersWashington Supreme Court · 1982
- Amalgamated Transit Union Local 587 v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- City of Tacoma v. Taxpayers of City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1987
- Garrison v. Washington State Nursing BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1976
- Vashon Island Committee for Self-Government v. Washington State Boundary Review BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1995
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Country Manor MHC, LLC v. OccupantCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- Country Manor Mhc, Llc v. Les & Linda CliftonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- State v. William Boswell Cook IVCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005