Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. William Boswell Cook IV

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided February 8, 2005No. 30705-7-IIPublished

1Dissent

¶31 (dissenting) — Because I believe the majority misreads the statute extending the limitations period for public officers, I dissent.

Armstrong, J.

f 32 When William Cook became a police officer, he took an oath of office stating that he would abide by the Code of Ethics and Conduct as enumerated in the Police Operations Manual and perform the duties of a Police Officer “as such duties are prescribed by law.” Clerk’s Papers (CP) at 59-60. The Code of Ethics states that as a law enforcement officer, he had a fundamental duty to serve mankind, safeguard lives and property, protect the innocent…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. RobertsWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. BeaverWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State v. BeaverWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Barendregt v. Walla Walla School District No. 140Court of Appeals of Washington · 1980
  5. HARTSON PARTNERSHIP v. MartinezCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API