Cassutt v. Cassutt
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.
— On August 25, 1921, the lower court, in a divorce action between the parties hereto, made findings of fact and conclusions of law to the effect that appellant was entitled to an interlocutory order of divorce from respondent, and on that day signed and entered the interlocutory order.
Among other things, the court found that the community property of the parties consisted, with other property, of a business known as the Seattle Music House, of the approximate value of between $40,000 and $50,000. The court concluded that appellant was entitled to, and respondent should pay to her as and for…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ruge v. RugeWashington Supreme Court · 1917
- Anderson v. AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 1917
- Holter v. HolterWashington Supreme Court · 1919
- Horst v. HorstWashington Supreme Court · 1917
- Worden v. WordenWashington Supreme Court · 1915
3Cited by9 opinions
- High v. HighWashington Supreme Court · 1953
- Robinson v. RobinsonWashington Supreme Court · 1950
- Hanson v. HansonWashington Supreme Court · 1960
- State Ex Rel. Foster v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1937
- State Ex Rel. Lang v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1934
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.