Legal Opinion

Horst v. Horst

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1917No. 13692PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Cross-appeals from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Tallman, J., entered April 28, 1916, upon findings favorable to the defendant, in an action to modify a. decree of divorce, tried to the court.

1Opinion of the CourtWebster, J.

— On April 28, 1908, plaintiff and defendant were married at Victoria, British Columbia. On May 8, 1915, plaintiff instituted an action for divorce against defendant in the superior court of King county. On June 25, 1915, after personal service on defendant, a default decree was entered granting to plaintiff an absolute divorce and awarding her the household furniture and alimony at the rate of $50 per month, payable weekly in advance. It was further provided in the decree that defendant should deliver to plaintiff a certificate of stock in the Standard Chemical Company, a Washington…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Secondo v. SecondoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  2. State Ex Rel. Lang v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Cassutt v. CassuttWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  4. State Ex Rel. Bushnell v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API