Legal Opinion

Perdicalis v. Perdicalis

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 8, 1949No. Civ. 14031PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWard, J.

Defendant and cross-complainant in a divorce action in which each party alleged cruelty appeals from a “particular part of the judgment . . . awarding and allotting to the plaintiff and cross defendant the real property standing in the joint names of the parties and consisting of a certain lot of land . . . together with the improvements thereon. ’ ’

The only question involved on appeal is whether the court erred in setting aside the entire real property to plaintiff and cross-defendant as community property when the property was obtained by the husband and wife “in joint tenancy. ’ ’

The…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Tomaier v. TomaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Siberell v. SiberellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Delanoy v. DelanoyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Rauer's Collection Co. v. HigginsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  5. LaMar v. LaMarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Socol v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Hunter v. HunterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  3. Sandrini v. AmbrosettiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  4. Nelson v. NelsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  5. Louknitsky v. LouknitskyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API