Legal Opinion

Bleuer v. Bleuer

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 12, 1910No. 530PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error from District Court, Pottawatomie County; W: N. Mdben, Judge. Action by Florence K. Bleuer against Robert P. Bleuer. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error. Citing: Mayer v. Mayer, 154 Mich. 386; Lynde v. Lynde, 181 U. S. 186; Id. (N. Y.) 56 N. E. 979; Dow v. Blake (Ill.) 39 Am. St. 156.

1Opinion of the CourtDunn, C. J.

This case presents error from the district court of Pottawatomie county.. Action was brought on an order for the payment of alimony made by one of the circuit courts of Illinois. From the statements of the petition it appears the parties hereto had been husband and wife, but on March 13, 1902, a divorce was granted at the suit of the wife in the state of Illinois; that an order was made requiring the husband to pay $15 per month alimony, which was paid by him to May 1, 1905; and that since that date he has refused to make any additional payments, and at the time of the bringing of this action…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Mayer v. MayerMichigan Supreme Court · 1908

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Biewend v. BiewendCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Levine v. LevineOregon Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Rowe v. RoweOregon Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Catlett v. CatlettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
  5. Campbell v. CampbellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API