Legal Opinion
Tube City v. Halishak, 88287 (5-3-2007)
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided May 3, 2007No. 88287PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION
{¶ 1} In this appeal, defendants-appellants, Christine Halishak ("Christine") and William B. ("William B.") Halishak (collectively "defendants"), appeal from the judgment of the Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas, which dismissed their motion for relief from judgment. For the following reasons, we affirm the decision of the trial court.
{¶ 2} A review of the record reveals the following: On February 25, 1999, plaintiff-appellee, Tube City Inc. ("Tube City") obtained a judgment against William F. ("William F.") and Debra ("Debra") Halishak, the parents of the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- GTE Automatic Electric, Inc. v. ARC Industries, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1976
- Rose Chevrolet, Inc. v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. CaldwellOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
- Akron-Canton Regional Airport Authority v. SwinehartOhio Supreme Court · 1980
- Ohio Civil Rights Commission v. First American Properties, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Cleveland v. Bryce Peters Fin. Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2013
- In Re McGee, 13-08-01 (5-27-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
- Vargyas v. BrasherOhio Court of Appeals · 2015