Bosher v. Euclid Income Tax Board of Review
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Francis E. Sweeney, Sr., J.
{¶ 1} In 1998, appellees, William and Ruby Bosher, while residents of Euclid, Ohio, received over $3.5 million in a lump sum from the Ohio Super Lotto game. They paid federal and state income tax but not city income tax on their winnings.
*331{¶ 2} Thereafter, the city of Euclid, an appellant, notified appellees that they owed $102,378.81 in city income tax for tax year 1998. Appellees contested the assessment, arguing that the Euclid Codified Ordinances did not authorize the city to tax lottery winnings. The Euclid Tax Administrator rejected this argument and upheld the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United Telephone Co. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- Roxane Laboratories, Inc. v. TracyOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. FriedmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1947
- Fisher v. NeusserOhio Supreme Court · 1996
3Cited by16 opinions
- Susan Fisler Silberstein v. City of DaytonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- State ex rel. Lee v. KarnesOhio Supreme Court · 2004
- Gesler v. City of Worthington Income Tax Board of AppealsOhio Supreme Court · 2013
- State ex rel. Hilltop Basic Resources, Inc. v. City of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 2008
- State ex rel. Rocco v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Elections (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2017
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.