Freight Forwarders Institute v. United States
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
FEINBERG, Circuit Judge:
This is an action to review two orders of the Interstate Commerce Commission which allowed Piggy-Back Shippers Association of Florida (“Piggy-Back”) to continue operation. 1 Therefore, once again 2 the cumbersome, inefficient machinery of a statutory three-judge court must be invoked to review the Commission’s action. 3 For reasons set forth below, we sustain the Commission insofar as it ruled, but remand for reconsideration of the issue it failed to decide.
Piggy-Back is one of a growing number of unlicensed shipper associations 4 whose activities pose a threat to…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Far East Conference v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- National Labor Relations Board v. Denver Building & Construction Trades CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Phillips v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Deering Milliken, Inc., a Corporation v. Reed Johnston, as Regional Director of the National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1961
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America (Uaw) v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1970
- Columbia Shippers and Receivers Ass'n, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1969
- Southern Pacific Transportation Co. v. Continental Shippers Ass'nDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1980
- Metropolitan Shipping Agents of Illinois, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1972
- Morgan Drive-Away, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1967
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.