Legal Opinion

Corey v. Griffin

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided April 3, 1902PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Bill in EQUITY, filed August 20,1901, to restrain the defendant from prosecuting against the plaintiffs an action at law under St. 1890, c. 437, for money paid as margins on wagering contracts. The defendant demurred. The Superior Court sustained the demurrer and made a decree dismissing the bill; and the plaintiffs appealed. The instrument under seal, mentioned by the court, on which the plaintiffs relied was as follows: “ Boston, February 6, 1901. Messrs.

Read the full summary

Bill in EQUITY, filed August 20,1901, to restrain the defendant from prosecuting against the plaintiffs an action at law under St. 1890, c. 437, for money paid as margins on wagering contracts. The defendant demurred. The Superior Court sustained the demurrer and made a decree dismissing the bill; and the plaintiffs appealed. The instrument under seal, mentioned by the court, on which the plaintiffs relied was as follows: “ Boston, February 6, 1901. Messrs. Corey, Milliken & Company, Bankers and Brokers, 53 State St., Boston. Gentlemen: I desire to carry an account with you for the purchase…

1Opinion of the CourtHammond, J.

Griffin, the defendant, brought an action at law against the present complainants under St. 1890, c. 437, to recover back a certain amount of money paid to them upon con*231tracts for the purchase and sale of certain stocks and securities; and this action is still pending. This bill is filed to enjoin the defendant from the prosecution of that action upon the ground that prior to every one of the contracts upon which recovery is sought therein the defendant signed a certain paper, a copy of one of which is annexed to the bill. It is a sealed instrument in the form of a letter to the complainants,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Equitable Life Assurance Society v. ClementsSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Fidelity Mutual Life Ass'n v. FicklinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1891
  3. Wall v. Metropolitan Stock ExchangeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
  4. Crandell v. WhiteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Willcox v. EdwardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Wilson v. HeadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904
  3. Chandler v. PrinceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  4. Continental Corp. v. GowdyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  5. Desseau v. HolmesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API