Legal Opinion

Goldberg v. Hauer

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided January 18, 1924No. 11,610PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBatman, J.

This is an action by appellee against appellant, based on an alleged breach of a written contract, in which á judgment was rendered against the latter for the sum of $800. Appellant filed a motion for a new trial, alleging among' the reasons therefor, that the assessment of the amount of recovery is erroneous, being too large. The action of the court in overruling this motion is assigned as error on appeal. We *24have carefully considered appellant’s brief, and have reached the conclusion that it discloses prima facie, that the court erred in overruling said motion for the reason stated above.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Outing Kumfy-Kab Co. v. IveyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1919
  2. Glencoe Cotton Mills v. Capital Paper Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1920
  3. Roberts v. FeslerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1920
  4. Robertson v. EwingIndiana Court of Appeals · 1922
  5. Union Traction Co. v. WolfIndiana Court of Appeals · 1920

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bryant v. School Town of Oakland CityIndiana Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Sheldmyer v. BiasIndiana Court of Appeals · 1942
  3. Dinsmore v. KreighbaumIndiana Court of Appeals · 1926
  4. Feldman v. ElmoreIndiana Court of Appeals · 1928
  5. Commercial Acceptance Co. v. DunnIndiana Court of Appeals · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API