Dinsmore v. Kreighbaum
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtNichols, C. J.
Action for seduction by appellant against appellee. There was a trial by jury and a verdict against appellant, on which judgment was rendered, from which this appeal. The error assigned is the action of the court in overruling appellant’s motion for a new trial, under which appellant presents that there was error in giving instruction No. 9 tendered by appellee. This instruction calls special attention to appellant as a witness, and to parts of her evidence.in such a way as that she may have been discredited and prejudiced thereby. Appellant has fully briefed the question and makes, in the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railroad v. LinderIndiana Supreme Court · 1925
- Goldberg v. HauerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1924
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bryant v. School Town of Oakland CityIndiana Supreme Court · 1930
- Kreighbaum v. DinsmoreIndiana Court of Appeals · 1929
- Tate v. LeggIndiana Court of Appeals · 1929