Legal Opinion

Outing Kumfy-Kab Co. v. Ivey

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 12, 1919No. 10,050PublishedCited by 8 opinions

From Laporte Circuit Court; James F. Gallaher, Judge. Action by Glen Ivey against the Outing Kumfy-Kab Company. From a judgment for plaintiff, the defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

This action was tried on appellee’s amended complaint. The substance of so much of the complaint as is essential to an understanding of the questions presented by this appeal is as follows:

*288“That Rheinhardt H. Brown and Emmet Scott were engaged in the manufacture of collapsible sulkies and baby carriages, at the times hereinafter mentioned. That on February 17th, 1915, the plaintiff entered into an oral agreement with Brown & Scott, by the terms of which Brown & Scott agreed to employ the plaintiff, and the plaintiff agreed to work for said Brown & Scott in their factory. That after the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Whitney v. WymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Illinois Central Railroad v. CheekIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Diamond Block Coal Co. v. CuthbertsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Stanton v. New York & Eastern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1890
  5. St. Louis & South-Eastern Railway Co. v. ValiriusIndiana Supreme Court · 1877

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Johnson v. JohnsonMontana Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Oliver v. CoffmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1942
  3. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. NicholsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1921
  4. Atlantic Refining Co. v. Ingalls & Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1936
  5. Brown v. FreudenbergIndiana Court of Appeals · 1938

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API