Legal Opinion

Burmister v. City of Prescott

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 1931No. Civil No. 2957PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, J.

This is an action for a writ of mandamus against the City of Prescott and certain officials thereof, hereinafter called appellees, to compel such officials to issue to the Continental Oil Com pany, a corporation, hereinafter called the company, a. license to operate an automobile service station on certain property in said city owned by the estate of R. H. Burmister, deceased. Elma T. Burmister, as administratrix of said estate, whom we shall hereafter call appellant, joined with the company in applying to the superior court of Yavapai county for the writ of mandamus. Judgment was rendered in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Milwaukee Medical College v. ChittendenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Lamar v. LamarSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  3. State v. Central Vermont Railway Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1908
  4. Miami Copper Co. v. StrohlArizona Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Thomas v. ElliottSupreme Court of Missouri · 1908

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Mendelsohn v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Chambers v. United Farm Workers Organizing CommitteeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
  3. Matter of StrobelArizona Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Johnson v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1948
  5. In Re Roseman's EstateArizona Supreme Court · 1949

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API