Legal Opinion
Parlato v. Chrysler Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 4, 1991PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
an action to recover damages pursuant to General Business Law § 198-a relating to the lease of a motor vehicle, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Ruskin, J.), entered August 6, 1989, as granted the motion of the defendant Chrysler Corp. for summary judgment dismissing the amended complaint insofar as it is asserted against it.
Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, with costs, the motion of the Chrysler Corp. is denied, and the amended complaint is reinstated insofar as asserted against that…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Chrysler Motors Corp. v. SchachnerNew York Supreme Court · 1988
- Loomis v. "Stu" Maguire's Equipment Sales, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Volkswagen of America, Inc. v. FriedmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Chrysler Motors Corp. v. SchachnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Colabella v. Europa International, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
3Cited by3 opinions
- Jones v. General Motors Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998
- Kornblatt v. Jaguar Cars, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Planet Motor Car, Inc. v. WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002