Legal Opinion

Jones v. General Motors Corp.

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided January 8, 1998No. 17961PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BOSSON, Judge.

1. This case presents us with our first opportunity to interpret New Mexico’s Motor Vehicle Quality Assurance Act, the so-called “Lemon Law,” which provides special remedies to certain purchasers of defective automobiles. See NMSA 1978, §§ 57-16A-1 through -9 (1985). We hold that Plaintiff cannot recover against General Motors Corporation (GMC) under the Lemon Law because he is not a consumer for purposes of the Act. However, we also hold that Plaintiff may recover nominal damages as well as attorneys’ fees under the Unfair Practices Act (UPA). See NMSA 1978, §§ 57-12-1…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Helman v. GallegosNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Hale v. Basin Motor Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Hughes v. Chrysler Motors Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Gonzales v. Surgidev Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Smith v. FDC Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1990

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Lohman v. Daimler-Chrysler Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Mulford v. Altria Group, Inc.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2007
  3. Brooks v. Norwest Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. Bhasker v. Kemper Cas. Ins. Co.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2019
  5. Atherton v. GOPINNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2012

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API