Legal Opinion
Bemis v. New York State Division of Human Rights
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 9, 2006PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRose, J.
Proceedings pursuant to Executive Law § 298 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Schenectady County) to review a determination of respondent New York State Division of Human Rights which, inter alia, found General Electric Company guilty of an unlawful discriminatory practice based on age.
Earl Bemis (hereinafter petitioner) filed a complaint with respondent New York State Division of Human Rights (hereinafter DHR) alleging that his employer, General Electric Company (hereinafter GE), had discriminated against him by terminating his employment as an engineer…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Miller Brewing Co. v. State Division of Human RightsNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Mittl v. New York State Division of Human RightsNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
- CUNY-Hostos Community College v. State Human Rights Appeal BoardNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- State Division of Human Rights v. MuiaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Hardy v. General Electric Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Anagnostakos v. New York State Division of Human RightsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Grella v. St. Francis HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Harrison v. Chestnut Donuts, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- New York State Office of Mental Health v. New York State Division of Human RightsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- New York State Tug Hill Commission v. New York State Division of Human RightsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008