Anagnostakos v. New York State Division of Human Rights
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Mercure, J.E
Proceeding pursuant to Executive Law § 298 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Broome County) to review a determination of respondent State Division of Human Rights which found petitioner guilty of unlawful discriminatory practice based on age.
In 1998, respondent Shirley R. Fiske filed a complaint with respondent State Division of Human Rights (hereinafter respondent) alleging that petitioner subjected her to age-related verbal harassment, reduced her hours and terminated her because of her age. Fiske had worked as a waitress at petitioner’s diner…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Forrest v. Jewish Guild for the BlindNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
- Ferrante v. American Lung Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
- New York City Transit Authority v. State Division of Human RightsNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
- Town of Lumberland v. New York State Division of Human RightsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Siani v. State University of New York at FarmingdaleDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2014
- Argyle Realty Associates v. New York State Division of Human RightsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- New York State Department of Correctional Services v. New York State Division of Human RightsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- City of Niagara Falls v. New York State Division of Human RightsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- KT'S Junction, Inc. v. New York State Division of Human RightsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.