Stowe v. McHugh
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LAVERY, J.
The defendant, John McHugh, appeals from the summary judgment rendered by the trial court in favor of four defendants that the court allowed to be cited in for the purpose of apportionment in this medical malpractice action. On appeal, McHugh claims that the trial court improperly (1) ruled that expert testimony was required on the issue of the apportionment defendants’ proportionate share of liability, (2) determined that the affidavits of his experts were insufficient to support his claims against the apportionment defendants, and (3) ruled that no issue of material fact…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Batick v. SeymourSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Mather v. Griffin HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Santopietro v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Adcox v. Children's Orthopedic Hospital & Medical CenterWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- Pool v. BellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Banfi v. American Hospital for RehabilitationWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2000
- Marchell v. WhelchelConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Amsden v. FischerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Law v. CampDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2000
- Carlson v. Waterbury HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.