Legal Opinion

Housing Study Group v. Kemp

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided May 16, 1990No. Civ. A. No. 90-0244PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

JOYCE HENS GREEN, District Judge.

This is yet another, but final, chapter in the ongoing dispute which has arisen as a result of the announcement by Jack F. Kemp, Secretary of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”), of his intention to terminate the coinsurance program established under Section 244 of the National Housing Act, as amended, 12 U.S.C. § 1715z-9. Plaintiffs are two active mortgage bankers approved by HUD to participate in the coinsurance program and a trade association of which the two mortgage bankers are members. Defendants are Jack F. Kemp, Federal Housing…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. McKart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Leedom v. KyneSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission v. Holiday Tours, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
  5. Virginia Petroleum Jobbers Ass'n v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Varicon International v. Office of Personnel ManagementDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1996
  2. Patriot, Inc. v. U.S. Department of Housing & Urban DevelopmentDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1997
  3. Associated Mortgage Bankers, Inc. v. CastroDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
  4. National Association for Gun Rights, Inc. v. GarlandDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2023
  5. Nelson v. PompeoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2023

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API