Legal Opinion

Associated Mortgage Bankers, Inc. v. Castro

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided December 1, 2017No. Civil Action No. 2017-0075Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ASSOCIATED MORTGAGE BANKERS INC., Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 17-0075 (ESH) v. BEN CARSON, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Before the Court is plaintiff’s motion for leave to file a first amended complaint. For the reasons that follow, the Court grants the motion in part and denies the motion in part. BACKGROUND I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND This suit involves a disagreement about the import of an indemnification agreement (“the Indemnification Agreement”) between plaintiff and defendants. Plaintiff Associated Mortgage…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Freytag v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. James Madison Limited, by Norman F. Hecht, Sr., Assignee v. Eugene A. Ludwig, Comptroller of the CurrencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
  4. Darby v. CisnerosSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Foremost-Mckesson, Inc. v. The Islamic Republic of IranCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API