Costello Construction Co. of Maryland, Inc. v. City of Charlottesville
District Court, W.D. Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
CONRAD, Chief Judge.
This diversity action arises from a contract entered into by Plaintiff Costello Construction Company of Maryland, Inc. (“Costello”) and Defendant City of Char-lottesville (the “City”), which provided for the construction of the Fontaine Fire Station in Charlottesville, Virginia (the “Project”). The case is presently before the court on the City’s motion to dismiss. For the following reasons, that motion will be denied.
Factual and Procedural Background
The court accepts the following facts, taken from Costello’s complaint, as true for purposes of…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Shirley Presley v. City of Charlottesville Rivanna Trails FoundationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2006
- Katyle v. Penn National Gaming, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2011
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.