Legal Opinion

Staniforth v. United States

District Court, S.D. California

Decided May 24, 2024No. 3:23-cv-00449Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RAYMOND STANIFORTH, Case No.: 23cv449-JM-MMP 12 Plaintiff, ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S 13 v. MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 14 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 15 Defendant. 16 17 18 Presently before the court is Defendant the United States of America’s Motion for 19 Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 15). Pursuant to Local Rule 7.1(d)(1), the court finds the 20 matters presented appropriate for resolution without oral argument. Having considered the 21 Parties’ arguments, the evidence, and the law, the court rules as follows. 22…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Day v. City of FontanaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  4. People v. ClevelandCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  5. People ex rel. McCauley & Tevis v. BrooksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API