State v. Abordo
Hawaii Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT BY
RICHARDSON, C.J.
Robert Abordo (hereinafter appellant) appeals from a judgment of conviction for unauthorized control of a propelled vehicle in violation of HRS § 708-836 (1976). He asserts, in essence, that the evidence used to secure his conviction was illegally obtained and, thus, should have been excluded by the trial court. We disagree and affirm the judgment below.
On October 21, 1975, two police officers were assigned to check for stolen vehicles in an area of Honolulu known as Salt Lake. The area, according to the testimony of the officers, was known to have a…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Josephs v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1990
- State v. WilsonHawaii Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. HaugeHawaii Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. AndersonHawaii Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. TorresHawaii Supreme Court · 2011
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.