Legal Opinion

The Hindustan

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided January 29, 1930PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GALSTOH, District Judge.

This cause arises out of personal injuries sustained by the libelant while working as a carpenter on the steamship Hindustan on October 31, 1924.

He was’ employed by the Mutual Lumber Company, which company had entered into a contract with the steamship company, to make certain repairs to the steamship Hindustan while lying at the Erie dock in Jersey City.

On arrival at the ship on the evening in question, he was ordered to work in the ’tween deck of hatch Ho. 4. The only lights supplied by the steamer were electric! clusters in the various hatches. It appears that these…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. The AuchenardenDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1900
  2. Harty v. Cromwell S. S. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1896
  3. The Clan GrahamDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1908
  4. SatillaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1916
  5. The SaranacDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1904

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Riley v. Agwilines, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1947
  2. Long v. Silver Line, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
  3. De Luca v. Shepard S. S. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
  4. Badalamenti v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1946
  5. Cioffi v. New Zealand Shipping Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1948

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API