Legal Opinion
The Clan Graham
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided September 2, 1908No. 4,817PublishedCited by 14 opinions
In Admiralty.
1Opinion of the Court
WOFVFRTON, District Judge.
This is a libel for the recovery of damages arising from injury to the person of the libelant. .The respondents Brown & McCabe, who were stevedores, were under contract with the respondent Clan Graham to load her with wheat. The libelant was a longshoreman, and in the employ of Brown & McCabe to assist in loading. It is averred thát the Clan Graham was an open ship between decks, with iron cross-beams running from one side to the other; that said cross-beams were partly covered over with between-deck hatches or planks, which made it appear safe 'for persons walking…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- The AuchenardenDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1900
- Harty v. Cromwell S. S. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1896
- The SaranacDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1904
- Walsh v. BabcockDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1887
- The GladiolusU.S. Circuit Court for the Southern District of Georgia · 1884
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Ramirez v. Toko Kaiun K.K.District Court, N.D. California · 1974
- Riley v. Agwilines, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1947
- Hite v. Maritime Overseas CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 1974
- Samad v. the Steamship EtivebankDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1955
- Long v. Silver Line, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.