Legal Opinion
In re Davis
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided February 9, 1995No. SB-94-0070-D; Disc. Comm. Nos. 89-1783, 90-0791, 90-1800PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MOELLER, Vice Chief Justice.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
I. Informal Reprimand and Probation
On September 26,1991, the State Bar filed a complaint against Gaila Davis.1 Pursuant to a consent agreement, she conditionally admitted that she had violated Rule 42, Ethical Rules 1.3 (diligence) and 8.1(b) (failure to respond to request from disciplinary authority), Rule 51(h) (failure to respond to bar inquiry), and Rule 51(i) (refusing to cooperate with State Bar), Arizona Rules of Supreme Court. In approving the consent agreement, the State Bar Hearing Committee found that:
Respondent failed…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Matter of NevilleArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, PappasArizona Supreme Court · 1988
- Matter of LevineArizona Supreme Court · 1993
- Matter of SpearArizona Supreme Court · 1989
- Musslewhite v. State Bar of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Matter of BrownArizona Supreme Court · 1996
- In re Phyllis McCoy Jacien, Esq.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2018
- In the Matter of Lise R. WittArizona Supreme Court · 2024