Legal Opinion

Matter of Brown

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 1996No. SB-95-0018-D. Disciplinary Commission No. 93-1413PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ZLAKET, Justice.

The respondent attorney is no stranger to the disciplinary process. He has been suspended once, censured three times, and twice placed on probation. Additionally, he has received three informal reprimands. In the present matter, the disciplinary commission rejected a hearing officer’s recommendation of another suspension and concluded that respondent should not be subject to sanctions beyond those which were previously imposed and are still in effect. It suggested only that he be assessed all expenses incurred by the State Bar of Arizona in pursuing this grievance.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, PappasArizona Supreme Court · 1988
  2. In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, KerstingArizona Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Matter of ArrickArizona Supreme Court · 1989
  4. In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona RedondoArizona Supreme Court · 1993
  5. In re DavisArizona Supreme Court · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re Disciplinary Proc. Against CohenWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  2. IN re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against CohenWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  3. In Re a Member of the State BarArizona Supreme Court · 1998
  4. In Re a Member of the State BarArizona Supreme Court · 1998
  5. In the Matter of Juan M MartinezArizona Supreme Court · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API