Legal Opinion

Keco, Inc. v. Hayward

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided June 30, 2005No. 100,925Published

1Opinion of the Court

123 P.3d 50 (2005)

2005 OK CIV APP 53

KECO, INC. and Medmarc Insurance Company, Petitioners,

v.

Carroll HAYWARD; Villanova Insurance Company; The Oklahoma Property and Casualty Insurance Guaranty Association; and the Workers' Compensation Court, Respondents.

No. 100,925.

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, Division No. 3.

June 30, 2005.

James S. Daniel, Paul A. Scott, Scott, Daniel and Associates, Oklahoma City, OK, for Petitioners.

Rex D. Brooks, Robert P. Powell, Rex D. Brooks & Associates, Oklahoma City, OK, for Respondent Carroll Haywood.

John B. Ballard, II, Ballard & Berkowitz, Oklahoma City, OK,…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Munsingwear, Inc. v. TullisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
  2. Cole v. Silverado Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
  3. In Re BomgardnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
  4. Knott v. Halliburton ServicesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
  5. Sudbury v. DeterdingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API