Legal Opinion

State v. Aldrich

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided October 16, 1987No. 86-826PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Colwell, D. J., Retired.

Richard Aldrich, defendant, appeals his conviction of first degree sexual assault, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 28-319 (Reissue 1985), assigning one procedural error, that the court abused its discretion in allowing the State, at the conclusion of all evidence, to amend its information by deleting one word, “and,” and substituting the word “or,” making the charge read in the disjunctive. We affirm.

Section 28-319 provides:(1) Any person who subjects another person to sexual penetration and (a) overcomes the victim by force, threat of force, express or implied, coercion, or…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Gossett v. O'GradyNebraska Supreme Court · 1940
  2. State v. JohnNebraska Supreme Court · 1982
  3. State v. McGeeNebraska Supreme Court · 1985
  4. State v. GascoigenNebraska Supreme Court · 1973
  5. State v. DavisNebraska Supreme Court · 1976

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. SmithNebraska Supreme Court · 2005
  2. State v. BanksNebraska Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State v. AntillonNebraska Supreme Court · 1988
  4. State v. MeersNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State v. FurreyNebraska Supreme Court · 2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API