Legal Opinion
PROGRESSIVE NORTHWEST INSURANCE v. Haker
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided October 26, 1989No. 9420-1-IIIPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShields, J.
Progressive Northwest Insurance Company filed a declaratory judgment action seeking a determination whether it was obligated to defend Justina Haker. Under the terms of the policy with its insured, Bonnie Frost, "no person shall be considered an insured person if the person drives the vehicle without the owner's expressed permission." On summary judgment, the court ruled Progressive was not obligated to defend Ms. Haker. We affirm.
The Frost vehicle was involved in an accident in Grant County on August 15, 1986. The driver was Ms. Haker, a friend of Ms. Frost's daughter, Ann, who was also in…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State Farm General Insurance v. EmersonWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- Federated American Insurance v. StrongWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- Kelly v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1983
- Safeco Insurance Co. of America v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1986
- Riley v. VIKING INSURANCE CO.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1987
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Beckman v. ConnollyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995
- Public Employees Mutual Insurance v. KellyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1991
- Robinson v. PEMCO INSURANCE COMPANYCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1993
- New Hampshire Insurance v. MyersCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1993
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.