Legal Opinion

Ripplinger v. OTTEM

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided September 8, 1950No. File 7216PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an action for damages arising from defendant’s alleged negligent introduction of Bang’s disease into plaintiff’s herd of cattle. The issues in the case were submitted to a jury and a verdict was returned in favor of the plaintiffs. Judgment was rendered upon the verdict and defendant has appealed from the judgment. There are no specifications of error.

Section 28-1809 R. C. .1943 provides:

“A party desiring ... to appeal from a judgment or other determination of a district court . . . , except upon appeals triable de novo in the- supreme court, shall serve with the . . . notice of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wilson v. KrygerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1914
  2. First National Bank v. BremsethNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Baird v. First National BankNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Barnum v. Gorham Land Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1904

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Lindenberg v. FolsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Mevorah v. GoodmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Mills v. RoggensackNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Odegaard v. Investors Oil, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Kemmer v. Sunshine Mutual InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1953

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API