Legal Opinion
STATE Ex HILE v. CLEVELAND (City) Et
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided April 19, 1927No. 7644PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Per curiam
George D. Hile, the relator filed suit against the City of Cleveland in the Cuyahoga Common Pleas and on appeal to this court the relator claims:—(1) The Ohio constitution does not permit the city to issue bonds for the purpose of purchasing land outside the limits of the city for a landing field for air craft, and for improving the land so acquired.(2) That if the city does have such a right, advertisement of the ordinance giving notice of the issuance and sale of said bonds,’was not published as required by law.(3) The legislation passed for the sale of said bonds is to raise money or to…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Vansuch v. State Ex Rel. FetchOhio Supreme Court · 1925
3Cited by8 opinions
- Dysart v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1928
- Aviation Services, Inc. v. Bd. of Adjustment of Hanover Tp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
- City & County of San Francisco v. Western Air Lines, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1962
- Schmoldt v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- Swetland v. Curtiss Airports CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1930
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.