Johnson v. Catoe
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MOORE, Justice.
We have accepted this case in our original jurisdiction to consider whether petitioner is entitled to a new trial based upon after-discovered evidence. We find that he is not so entitled.
FACTS
In September 1985, Daniel Swanson was driving his RV through North Carolina on his way to Florida when he picked up petitioner, who was hitchhiking. The following day, Swanson and petitioner picked up hitchhikers, Curtis Harbert and Connie Sue Hess, on Interstate 95. Thereafter, Swanson was shot in the back of the head with a .357 pistol at close range. His body was concealed under a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
- State v. SpannSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
- Johnson v. CatoeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
3Cited by5 opinions
- Sanford v. South Carolina State Ethics CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2009
- Gallman v. StirlingDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2024
- Johnson v. CatoeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
- Johnson v. Maynard, Director, South Carolina Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Sanford v. South Carolina State Ethics CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2009