State v. Spann
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
FINNEY, Chief Justice:
This is an appeal from the denial of a new trial motion based upon after-discovered evidence. We find the trial judge erred in finding certain expert evidence could have been discovered by the exercise of due diligence, and reverse and remand for a new trial.
Appellant was convicted of the 1981 sexual assault, robbery, and murder of Melva Neill, as well as the burglary of her home, and received a death sentence. See State v. Spann, 279 S.C. 399, 308 S.E.2d 518 (1983). In order to prevail in this new trial motion, appellant must show the after-discovered evidence:(1) is…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. SpannSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1983
- State v. PrinceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
- State v. ParkerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1967
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. MercerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2009
- Johnson v. CatoeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
- State v. WoodsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000
- State v. HillCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
- Jamison v. CohenDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2016
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.