Legal Opinion
Peggy Dawson Etc. v. United States Department of Housing and Urban Development
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided April 11, 1979No. 77-1382PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Per curiam
This case involves statutory construction of the Uniform Relocation and Assistance and Real Property Acquisitions Policies Act (URA), 42 U.S.C. § 4601, et seq. The sole question is whether the government must pay relocation assistance to the plaintiff who was forced to move by a private developer.
The district court found for the government and its opinion is reported at 428 F.Supp. 328 (N.D.Ga.1976). The precise issue presented in this appeal has been decided by the Eighth Circuit in Moorer v. HUD, 561 F.2d 175 (8 Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 436 U.S. 919, 98 S.Ct. 2266, 56 L.Ed.2d 760 (1978),…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Gloria Conway, Individually and on Behalf of All Other Persons Similarly Situated v. Patricia HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978
- Dawson v. United States Department of Housing & Urban DevelopmentDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1976
3Cited by6 opinions
- Isham v. PierceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co. v. 104 Acres of Land, More or Less, in Providence CountyDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1993
- Buck Austin v. Cecil D. Andrus, Secretary of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Parlane Sportswear Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
- Isham v. PierceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.