Legal Opinion
Buck Austin v. Cecil D. Andrus, Secretary of the Interior
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 2, 1981No. 78-1896PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
POOLE, Circuit Judge:
Members of the Navajo Indian tribe forced to relocate because of mining activities on their reservation appeal from orders dismissing their complaint and granting the federal defendants summary judgment on the issue whether plaintiffs are entitled to assistance as “displaced persons” within the meaning of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real People Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (Relocation Act), 84 Stat. 1894, 42 U.S.C. § 4601 et seq. Jurisdiction in this court rests on 28 U.S.C. § 1291.
Because the displacement did not result from a written order to vacate or…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Alexander v. United States Department of Housing & Urban DevelopmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Parlane Sportswear Company, Inc. v. Caspar WeinbergerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1975
- Gloria Conway, Individually and on Behalf of All Other Persons Similarly Situated v. Patricia HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978
- Parlane Sportswear Company, Inc. v. WeinbergerDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1974
- Dawson v. United States Department of Housing & Urban DevelopmentDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Isham v. PierceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co. v. 104 Acres of Land, More or Less, in Providence CountyDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1993
- Isham v. PierceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982