Legal Opinion

Siegel v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 27, 1992No. 04-91-00651-CVPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BUTTS, Justice.

This is an appeal from a trial court’s dismissal of a suit as a sanction for discovery abuse.

Sharon Siegel, a cardiovascular surgeon now practicing in California, filed suit on November 13, 1990, against Smith and Kelly, individually and doing business as Car-diothoracic Surgical Associates, alleging breach of an employment contract. Siegel was served on March 28, 1991, with a notice of intention to take her oral deposition on April 12. The defendants agreed to *194reschedule when Siegel’s counsel advised that the date was inconvenient.

Defense counsel served Siegel’s…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Downer v. Aquamarine Operators, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. TransAmerican Natural Gas Corp. v. PowellTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Masinga v. WhittingtonTexas Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Martinez v. RutledgeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979
  5. Bohmfalk v. Linwood, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1987

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Martin v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
  2. Sells v. DROTT, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2011
  3. Laverna Sells v. Earl Drott, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2010
  4. Laverna Sells v. Earl Drott, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API