Masinga v. Whittington
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SPEARS, Justice.
This mandamus proceeding involves a pretrial discovery order permitting a deposition to be taken only by stenographic recording and not by videotape recording. We conclude that the trial judge abused his discretion in so ordering and conditionally grant the writ of mandamus.
In an attempt to prevent the videotaping of his deposition, Nadim Nasir, Jr., M.D., a defendant in the underlying suit, sought a protective order based solely on the following unverified objection:
Dr. Nasir objects strenuously to the videotaping of his oral deposition for the reason that the presence…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Garcia v. PeeplesTexas Supreme Court · 1987
- Independent Insulating Glass/Southwest, Inc. v. StreetCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1987
- Mole v. Millard, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1988
3Cited by43 opinions
- Estate of Pollack v. McMurreyTexas Supreme Court · 1993
- General Tire, Inc. v. KeppleTexas Supreme Court · 1998
- Diamond Offshore Servs. Ltd. v. WilliamsTexas Supreme Court · 2018
- Brewer & Pritchard, P.C. v. Johnson, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2005
- In Re CollinsTexas Supreme Court · 2009
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.