Legal Opinion

Masinga v. Whittington

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 1990No. C-9579PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SPEARS, Justice.

This mandamus proceeding involves a pretrial discovery order permitting a deposition to be taken only by stenographic recording and not by videotape recording. We conclude that the trial judge abused his discretion in so ordering and conditionally grant the writ of mandamus.

In an attempt to prevent the videotaping of his deposition, Nadim Nasir, Jr., M.D., a defendant in the underlying suit, sought a protective order based solely on the following unverified objection:

Dr. Nasir objects strenuously to the videotaping of his oral deposition for the reason that the presence…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Garcia v. PeeplesTexas Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Independent Insulating Glass/Southwest, Inc. v. StreetCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1987
  3. Mole v. Millard, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1988

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Estate of Pollack v. McMurreyTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  2. General Tire, Inc. v. KeppleTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Diamond Offshore Servs. Ltd. v. WilliamsTexas Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Brewer & Pritchard, P.C. v. Johnson, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2005
  5. In Re CollinsTexas Supreme Court · 2009

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API