Legal Opinion

Holli L. Telford v. Hon. David C. Nye

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided April 23, 2013No. 39497PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

W. JONES, Justice.

I. Nature of the Case

This is an appeal of an Administrative Order declaring appellant, Holli Lundahl Tel-ford (“Telford”), a vexatious litigant pursuant to Idaho Court Administrative Rule 59. Tel-ford appeals the order.

II. Factual and Procedural Background

On October 11, 2011, Administrative District Judge Nye issued an Administrative Order Declaring Vexatious Litigant (“prefiling order”). Judge Nye issued this prefiling order pursuant to Idaho Court Administrative Rule 59. At the time the pre-filing order was issued, there were no proceedings before Judge Nye to which…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. De Long v. HennesseyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  2. Sun Valley Shopping Center, Inc. v. Idaho Power Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Olsen v. J.A. Freeman Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Bradbury v. Idaho Judicial CouncilIdaho Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Clear Springs Foods, Inc. v. SpackmanIdaho Supreme Court · 2011

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Colafranceschi v. Moody (In re Prefiling Order Declaring Vexatious Litigant)Idaho Supreme Court · 2019
  2. In re Prefiling Order Declaring Vexatious Litigant, Pursuant to I.C.A.R. 59.Idaho Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Greenfield v. MeyerIdaho Supreme Court · 2024
  4. John Doe I and Jane Doe I v. John DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2025
  5. Robert A. Kantor v. Sondra Louise KantorIdaho Supreme Court · 2016

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API