In re Prefiling Order Declaring Vexatious Litigant, Pursuant to I.C.A.R. 59.
Idaho Supreme Court
1Per curiam
This appeal arises from an administrative order declaring Ronald Van Hook a vexatious litigant under Idaho Court Administrative Rule 59. Van Hook appealed. We now affirm, holding that there was no abuse of discretion when the administrative district judge found Van Hook to be a vexatious litigant.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
This case began as a highly contentious divorce proceeding between Van Hook and his then-wife Dawn Cannon, in which Van Hook lost custody of his children (hereinafter the Canyon County divorce case). Van Hook was represented by legal counsel only for portions of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Lunneborg v. My Fun Life, Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 2018
- Holli L. Telford v. Hon. David C. NyeIdaho Supreme Court · 2013
3Cited by6 opinions
- Fitzpatrick v. KentIdaho Supreme Court · 2020
- In re The Children of S.U. v. C.J.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2021
- Mark V.H. v. Dolores J. M.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2019
- S.U. v. Central Atlantic Legal Group, PLLCWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2022
- Van Hook v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2022
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.