O'CONNELL v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SWAN, Circuit Judge (after stating the facts as above).
The power summarily to punish for contempt extends to misbehavior in the presence of the court “or so near thereto as to obstruct. the administration of justice.” Rev. St. § 725,28 USCA § 385; Ex parte Savin, Petitioner, 131 U. S. 267, 9 S. Ct. 699, 33 L. Ed. 150. Whether witnesses before the grand jury are to be deemed within the court’s presence, as aeems probable from Savin, Petitioner, or within the “so near” clause, we need not decide. In either event their recalcitrancy may be dealt with summarily. It is true that what occurs within…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Cooke v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Blair v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- United States v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Ex Parte TerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Wilson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by67 opinions
- Communist Party of United States v. Subversive Activities Control Bd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Mulloney v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1935
- United States v. SmythDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1952
- In Re PilloSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,948 United States of America v. Alan C. SolomonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.