Legal Opinion
Rohit LNU v. Christopher Chestnut, et al.
District Court, E.D. California
Decided September 23, 2026No. 1:26-cv-00016Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 ROHIT LNU, Case No. 1:26-cv-00016-JLT-SAB-HC 11 Petitioner, ORDER VACATING JULY 30, 2026 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION 12 v. 13 CHRISTOPHER CHESTNUT, et al., (ECF No. 26) 14 Respondents. AMENDED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION TO DISMISS 15 PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AS MOOT 16 17 Petitioner, represented by counsel, is proceeding with a petition for writ of habeas corpus 18 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. 19 I. 20 BACKGROUND 21 Petitioner was born in India and entered the United States on June 20, 2024 and was 22…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Zadvydas v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- J. Wilkerson v. B. WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Prieto-Romero v. ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Jamice Carey v. Hector Crescenzi, Armando Crescenzi and Harenzy Realty Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- Ramiro Cruz Espinoza v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.