Legal Opinion

Universal Transport & Distributing Co. v. Cantu

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 21, 1934No. Nos. 11841, 11925, 11926PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an original application for a writ of mandamus to require the clerk of the district court of Karnes county to approve and file a supersedeas bond tendered by petitioner in cause No. 4010, which it seeks to bring to this court on appeal.

The petition originally contained an application for mandamus to compel the clerk to deliver the transcript in the cause, but as the clerk, Mrs. Maude Pyle, has in her reply expressed her willingness to deliver the transcript upon terms acceptable to petitioner, it will not be necessary to consider this phase of the petition.

The clerk, upon the request…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bean v. PolkCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
  2. In re KeoghNew York Supreme Court · 1897

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Transamerican Natural Gas Corp. v. Finkelstein, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1995
  2. Elliott v. LesterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  3. Brown & Root, Inc. v. DeSautellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977
  4. Peeples v. NagelCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
  5. Community Health of South Dade, Inc. v. HaleDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API