Legal Opinion
Janet Smith and David Smith v. J. Joseph Danyo, M.D
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided October 17, 1978No. 78-1192PublishedCited by 84 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GIBBONS, Circuit Judge:
Janet and David Smith appeal from an adverse judgment in their diversity medical malpractice action against Dr. J. Joseph Danyo. They contend that the trial court erred in denying their motion, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 144, that he disqualify himself from sitting in the case for reasons of personal bias or prejudice. They also urge that the court committed error in failing to make available to counsel certain special interrogatories in advance of their being submitted to the jury, that the jury’s answers to those interrogatories are inconsistent, and that the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- United States v. Evan Alexander ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
- United States v. Herbert A. EllenbogenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
- Eisler v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1948
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by84 opinions
- Burke v. RegaladoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
- Franks v. NimmoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
- In Re International Business MacHines Corporation, United States of America v. International Business MacHines CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- Landes Construction Co., Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Royal Bank of Canada, Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Johnson v. TruebloodCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.